Meta:Requests for CheckUser information

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests and proposals Requests for CheckUser information on Meta-Wiki (for other wikis please go to here) Archives (current)→
This page allows you to request CheckUser information on Meta.
  • Please read the CheckUser policy before asking for a check.
  • When adding new requests, please use the {{checkuser}} template to list the user names in question and {{checkip}} for IP adresses, which simplifies investigation.
  • List your request at the bottom of the "Requests for Meta-Wiki only" heading.
  • When asking for a check we need to know:
    • why do you believe that the accounts are related (please present evidence for that with the help of diffs, etc.),
    • why, if the accounts are related, they are being used abusively, in violation of policy; and
    • why a block or other measures can't be justified without the need of technical evidence.
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Symbol wait.svg Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball
Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.

Requests for Meta-Wiki only[edit]


See Steward_requests/Miscellaneous#How_and_where_could_cross_wiki_disruptive_behavior_and_CU_request_be_filed. The user raises some very good points. If Liuxinyu970226 is indeed editing logged-in and logged-out in that IP range, it would explain several oddities I noticed in the past with some recurring Requests for new languages trolls which were all heroically fought off by Liuxinyu970226. --MF-W 20:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[]

MF-W, thank you for the report. Unfortunately we are unable to make public connections between accounts and IPs. Best regards, Vermont (talk) 21:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Anyway, I totally don't know why 117.* IP address always monitor the pages where I comment, and drop their comments that try to connect with me. I usually visit to try to make sure that I'm not using vandal IPs, and I reverted some edits by Special:Contributions/ If I was indeed "editted logged-out" by some other IP ranges (e.g. today my IP is under a 101.* range), I will totally stop it with no holds barred, and I will consider all the 117.* edits as spams and try my best to revert them, unless enough AGF-able. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@Vermont: So is this been not done, or you will still check me with nothing told to us? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Or bumping other CUs @Ajraddatz, MarcoAurelio, Sotiale, and Trijnstel: (no idea if I'm trolling or not), this is already opened for 10 days, and nothing provided to close this case, is this staled or no consensus? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Marco Choi 04[edit]

Repeatly creating frivolous RFL pages that are deleted several times, with only a skeleton template format. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[]

See also[edit]