Meta:Proposed page moves

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests and proposals Proposed page moves Archives (current)→
Shortcut:
WM:PPM
This is the page to propose page moves that might be controversial. These should be listed for seven days and implemented if there is no opposition. Any language may be used on this page, although English is the most common. Users who wish to use this place should place {{move}} on the page in question to alert other users, which adds the page to Category:Proposed page moves.
  • The following are usually renamed without delay:
    • Spelling mistakes
    • Trivial changes (such as renaming an archive page).
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Participate:

Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose most recent comment is older than 180 days.

Current requests[edit]

Submit your request at the bottom of the section.

{{User php}}{{User PHP}}[edit]

This is to match Category:User PHP. — ExE Boss (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Move queue[edit]

Pages in this section are ready to be moved.

  • The request to move pages for WMF departments and teams was archived. Anyone want to tackle the remaining pages? Some of the moves require admin/translations-admin rights. (The move of Global Reach is no longer needed, as the team was renamed again and a new page was created under the new name.) --Yair rand (talk) 05:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
@Yair rand and Camouflaged Mirage: The 2019 request is at Meta:Proposed_page_moves/Archives/2019#Moving_pages_for_WMF_departments_and_teams. A user Chelston-temp-1 today just moved Community Relations Team https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Relations_Team. @Praxidicae: reverted the move. Again, the discussion is in that link the archive here, but we can revisit this. I still support the move because for example, I see community relations as 99% Wikipedia volunteer activity and only in a narrow particular way a Wikimedia Foundation activity. I still support clarifying WMF activities in a manner similar to how we do with other wiki affiliate organizations like chapters, rather than labeling as if the very few things the WMF does is the default and that the community activity is the part to qualify. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Pardon me for replying late @Bluerasberry, I personally have no opinion for it but will defer to someone else to handle. Feel free to ask for admin attention if this have consensus (or continued silent consensus) on RFH if needed as this page is quite low in traffic. Sorry for the wait. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)