User talk:AntiCompositeNumber

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AntiCompositeNumber!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear AntiCompositeNumber,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Random? Missouri? Show me?[edit]

I see now. You are acting as a gate keeper. A troll.

Well bully for you.

What just happened to a page of writing.

Just disappeared after i went to fetch a url link since i dont want to be committing a copyright violation when uploading a tintype of long dead potentially important american figures by a long dead anonymous photographer.

This is not random. I take that as an insult. Yes i am making a claim. You make me out to be a copyright criminal. Well shill. Check this out.

You dont know a damn thing about missouri so please quit with the ‘show me’. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzresin (talk • contribs) 04:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, AntiCompositeNumber. You have new messages at BananaYesterday's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BananaYesterday (talk • contribs) 19:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

will be more careful[edit]

Hello, About the File:Actress Shin Hyun Been for Sunset In My Hometown Cine Concert on June 19, 2018.jpg At first Your bot has tagged me because I only included the License in text not tag. Before this I uploaded many photos at once cause I saw from some page of wikicommons that has the same source ie. tistory blog so I think Oh I can use it but the fact it was not permitted. I got it that the photo should from the site that has CC Creative Commons license so I searched for the source and finally found it but it is "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Korea (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR)" in this website , However this one can't be used for commercial purpose, not sure if wikipedia is a commercial one? By the way, I added the tag (CC-BY-2.0 KR) right after I was warning from the bot and I was confused like how to deal with the bot's warning after adding the license tag. I apology for that. And I want someone to review if (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR) can be used or not and just found out from your link that it cannot. For now,I know from the referred link/table "Summary of Creative Commons licenses on Wikimedia Commons " what kinds of CC that can be used it is so helpful I was very confused and new to this kind of things/edits. Thank you I will be more careful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winniebeen (talk • contribs) 18:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


Hi! i suggest this template be retained for historical reference and marked with {{Historical}}. -- RZuo (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@RZuo What's the point of keeping it? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
for example, with it deleted, an old revision of a page with the template will not display correctly. it was an integral part of an important page on commons. RZuo (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@RZuo I've restored it and sent it to DR. You may make your arguments there. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


    "enabled": true,
    "display": {
        "headerLabel": "{{WLM-is-running|ba-srp|{{Upload campaign header wlm-ba-srp}}|before={{Upload campaign header Wiki Loves Monuments August}}|after={{Upload campaign header Wiki Loves Monuments finished}}|no=yes}}",
        "thanksLabel": "{{Upload campaign use Wiki Loves Monuments}}"
    "defaults": {
        "categories": [
            "Cultural heritage monuments in the Republika Srpska"
    "autoAdd": {
        "wikitext": ""
    "licensing": {
        "ownWorkDefault": "own",
        "ownWork": {
            "licenses": [
    "fields": [
            "wikitext": "{{Непокретна културна добра Републике Српске|$1}}",
            "label": "{{int:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-generic-id}}"
    "wikibase": {
        "enabled": false
    "tutorial": {
        "skip": true

Bojana Wiki PG (talk) 19:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@Bojana Wiki PG ✓ Done, see Campaign:wlm-ba-srp. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)



Some of the filenames of these files aren't complete for some reason. Also you would expect that this search would say "File:PDP-CH - Philadelphia Orchestra - -Wikipedia-Leopold Stokowski-Leopold Stokowski - Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 in F major, BWV 1047 - 1st Movement- Allegro - Johann Sebastian Bach - Hmv-d1708-42-606.flac (redirect from File:PDP-CH - Philadelphia Orchestra - -Wikipedia-Leopold Stokowski-Leopold Stokowski - Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 in F major, BWV 1047 - 1st Movement- Allegro - Johann Sebastian Bach - Hmv-d1708-42-606.flac.flac)" however it isn't. Might you know why?Jonteemil (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@Jonteemil First one, probably a bug. Second one, probably not a bug. It's not documented but is consistent with how insource works. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. Do you know where I would ask if the second one is a bug or not?Jonteemil (talk) 20:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Could you please delete these Board Election Vidoes?[edit]

Hi @AntiCompositeNumber:, I trust you are well. Can you please assist me delete these two videos immediately?

@Zuz (WMF) ✓ Done AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! @AntiCompositeNumber: Regards, Zuz (WMF) (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Celtic Minded[edit]

Hi, as you recently closed the related ANU thread, would you consider collapsing at least the paragraphs from this account that nobody else responded to, rather than just striking them? It's a lot of text to allow from a locked account, in fact, I think it's more dialogue than from anyone else there right now. Thanks -- (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

@ Sure, ✓ Done. Ended up collapsing the replies to them as well, because they weren't really productive and not doing so made the thread harder to read. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Not banned, whew![edit]

ACN - just so you know, I was following the thread where you struck some comments, and when I read in the collapse bar, "Globally-banned user AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)" (for example) the meaning I took from that was this: "Comments in this thread by globally-banned user AntiCompositeNumber starting at <timestamp> have been struck". The fact that I saw it four or five times there, and did a brief open-shut click/glance on one of them without really reading, just to get a sense of the length, and number of editors (as one does, you know what I mean) did not change that impression. Because I know you, sort of, through your contributions and actions at en-wiki, I remember thinking how strange that you were banned here; then shrugged it off, and went on. (I should note I'm only an occasional visitor to COM, but I suppose that's not unusual for many en-wiki folks.) Anyway, in order to avoid confusion of this nature going forward, may I suggest a different title? How 'bout something like,

Comments by globally-banned user struck per <some policy>     by AntiCompositeNumber (talk) hh:mm dd Month yyyy

Nothing here...

It wasn't till I came here to find out why you were banned, that the light bulb came on. Just a thought. Mathglot (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

@Mathglot I was trying to avoid putting too much text in the collapse boxes, though I can see how you might be confused by that. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Shorter, maybe?
Collapsed comments by globally-banned user     by AntiCompositeNumber (talk)

Nothing here...

The timestamp of the collapse action is in the history, and isn't really necessary for thread integrity I don't think. Anyway, I'll leave this with you. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


File:Ewald Dahlskog självporträtt.jpg and File:Erik Alsmark självporträtt4.jpg have been PD-70 since the beginning of this year; could you restore them? Thanks. DS (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

@DragonflySixtyseven ✓ Done Please ensure that the file description pages are now accurate. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Stellar Photo Recovery.png[edit]

File:Stellar Photo Recovery.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Perryprog (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Code issues in User:AntiCompositeNumber/temp.js[edit]

Hi AntiCompositeNumber, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:AntiCompositeNumber/temp.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 2 column 10: Unexpected identifier

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 20:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC).